The USDA Food Pyramid vs an Evidence-Based Pyramid

This is the second entry in a six-week series of topics following the syllabus of my Human Nutrition & Obesity graduate summer course. Each entry offers a snapshot or principal take home message from that lecture. This lecture was entitled: Zen and the Mindful Eater.

It is famously asked: “Why are humans the only animal that has to be told what to eat?” We are seemingly bombarded by nutritional advice from a multitude of sources, and the Human Nutrition & Obesity course now becomes part of this continuum. A consequence of this, not unexpectedly, is significant confusion among the public, as well as increased cynicism and skepticism to published nutritional recommendations. Dietary advice from the U.S. government began in 1916 (see the Washington Post’s The history of the food pyramid), and it would be fair to say that until the introduction of the classic USDA food pyramid in 1992, this advice was largely been well-intentioned, if a bit naïve. Beginning in the 1970s, however, two opposing factors gained sufficient significance to affect and shape the development of the future food pyramid. Firstly, health professionals were grappling with how best to address the rapidly increasing rates of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and obesity. Secondly, U.S. farmers were increasing their focus on the production of commodity crops like corn, soybeans, wheat, and sugar beets and as the prices of these crops decreased, the economic incentives to increase beef, pork and chicken production became very attractive.

Thus, the 1992 USDA food pyramid was shaped under the influence of two conflicting forces: offering nutritional advice and marketing the products of U.S. farmers. The result is a food pyramid that fails the health test.

When adherence to the USDA food pyramid recommendations are plotted versus the relative risk of suffering a major chronic disease, those in the highest quintile of adherence, meaning those 20% who followed the advice of the USDA the closest, have an insignificantly decreased risk of chronic disease compared to those in the bottom 20% who completely ignored the food pyramid. Part of the blame for this failure is laid at the feet of health professionals who made well-intentioned, but scientifically indefensible dietary recommendations. But another significant part of the blame goes to dietary advice that is shaped more by a desire to market our surplus in commodity crops. An example of this conflict of interest is horrifyingly illustrated by the USDA’s under-the-table Dairy Management group marketing cheese to pizza makers.

Although a course can be designed around a critique of the USDA food pyramid, a more constructive approach is to offer an alternative evidence-based pyramid. I have chosen the Healthy Eating Pyramid that was originally proposed in Eat, Drink, and Be Healthy by Walter C. Willett, MD of the Harvard School of Public Health.

The Health Eating Pyramid will serve as the framework for the first part of this course as we introduce and examine the evidence behind the recommended proportions in our diet of the major food groups. We will learn that carbohydrates, proteins and fats play very different roles in our physiology and health, and as the proportions of these food groups have changed over the years, so have our relative risks of chronic disease.

This entry was posted in Analysis/Policy. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The USDA Food Pyramid vs an Evidence-Based Pyramid

  1. William says:

    The food pyramid is a joke. Grains are complex carbohydrates and are usually very acid forming in the cells after they are metabolized.The best way to get fat or obese is to eat a lot complex or (even worse) refined carbohydrates.

  2. Thanks for a marvelous posting! I really enjoyed reading it, you will be a great author.
    I will ensure that I bookmark your blog and will often come back later on.
    I want to encourage you to continue your great job,
    have a nice day!

    my page … treatment for high blood pressure

  3. Simply desire to say your article iis as surprising.
    The clarity for your post is just cool and i can think you’re an experrt in this
    subject. Well together with your permission let me to grasp your RSS feed to stay up to
    date with imminent post. Thanks a million and pleas carry on the enjoyable work.

    Feel free to visit my weblog: woman seeking

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *