Anti-Blackness: A View From Dharmic Life

|| Namaste ||
|| Auṁ Svastir Astu ||

In the days following the murder of George Floyd by a police officer of the United States, the clarion call for action from the afflicted and their allies has been heard by people with Dharmic backgrounds. However, when it comes to responding to it, there is much room for growth, and I believe it is a justifiable observation that our communities have not been as vocal with our support of the push to drive out social and systemic racism as it affects our Black non-binary kin, sisters and brothers and their communities in the US.

Why is this the case? Well, our communities have been dealing with racism in a different way for a few centuries, with methods differing due to what was required by the varying local contexts. But as we are now all part of the United States, reevaluation of our methods for dealing with racism is necessary. Many of us realised that in order to act decisively and with integrity, our own internalised anguish was surfacing. This needed to be dealt with in order for us to understand why it was important to stand with our Black non-binary kin, sisters and brothers in a way that is dissimilar to the manner in which we fight our own battles with racism. Yet, as those issues surfaced, I have come to see that there is definitely no consensus about how they should be channelled and too often, Hindus were invoking vasudhaiva kuṭumbakam (the world is indeed a family) in an alarming approximation of the ‘all lives matter’ rhetoric. African and Africa-diasporic followers of the Dharmas have asked us to do better than this, and I agree.

Colleagues and other critical thinkers from India, Nepal, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka and Bhutan or descendants, have been caught off-guard in their responses to the current call to counter social and institutionalised anti-Blackness. To many of them, educated solely in the western method view the descendants of mother Africa as a different race, meaning this is not their fight. The problem is, of course, that in all of the countries mentioned, there is a vast amount of racism, colourism, and casteism that has yet to be successfully analysed and countered in the public sphere, in large part due to the nature of politics and questionable scholarship (both operating in colonial-legacy-mode) in and about the region. Whilst a thorough examination is beyond the scope of this note, the following walks through an overview of the major issues, concluding with a suggested way forward.

Let us start with some research-based framing

Anti-Blackness is not an historically supported notion in South Asian countries – in their inceptions. When the majority of all of the nineteen ancient kingdoms and republics (sixteen Mahājanapadas encompassing people of Drāviḍa, Muṇḍa, Ārya and other ethnicities, plus the Draviḍian Pāṇḍya, Choḷa and Chera kingdoms, 6th-3rd centuries BCE), and the numerous tribes that made up South Asia were comprised of people who had very, very similar phenotypes, owing to an extremely close genotype, to our ancestors in Africa, it is ludicrous to think that those societies wouldn’t view dark skin as normative. Indeed, Śhyāma-Sundara – Black Beauty – is the personification of the Supreme Being for one of the larger ancient religious traditions from the region. The Great Mother, Mahā Kālī, is unreservedly black. The majority of brāhmaṇas (scholars) were as dark-skinned as the śhūdras (workers) and vice-versa. The archetypical antisocial outlier, Rudra, was described as white as snow. We were comfortable in our dark skin. So, why is it that our societies ended up imbibing a need for young women to reach for ‘Fair and Lovely’ creams in the make-up aisle?

It hardly needs restating that creating the notion that a group deserves respect even if undeserved has its roots in various imperialist projects – whether Greece, Rome, or Egypt – commonly known as divide and rule. It also took root in some kingdoms in ancient South Asia around the end of the period when the first megacities emerged in the Gangetic plains (c. 5th century BCE, thousands of years after the first cities in other parts of ancient South Asia). However, this notion was rejected by numerous countries independently first, and then, as they were stitched into the patchwork of empires, individual societies resisted.

They had good ground to do so: The Ṛgveda (Indra, you raise up the oppressed, and the disabled, RV 2.13.12), the Bhagavadgītā (the wise person does not discriminate against living beings on the ground of difference in appearance, BG 5.18) and plentiful others, coupled with the ancient Vedāntic teaching of natural unity through diversity (bhedābheda) – all were very present in the minds of spiritual seekers. Make no mistake: the Āryas thought of themselves as supremely noble, but the Āryas included both the Buddhist and Jain traditions who vociferously countered the varṇa, or class system, of the earlier Āryas. The dichotomy of Ārya and Non-Ārya was based not on race, but on adherence to a culture that was perceived to be ‘noble.’ By the time the early Indo-Āryans of Punjab proliferated the Vedic culture, they were phenotypically quite similar to the rest of their neighbours in the Indus Valley Civilisation.

Localised tribes became Ārya or remained non-Ārya: the Khāsi tribe of Northeastern India, and the Kalāsh of Afghanistan are examples of the numerous tribes who chose to remain isolated from the Ārya culture, whilst living alongside them. The human tendency to tribalism was thus challenged, and so the new modus of identity making centred on adopting a different culture. A close approximation would be the Eastern world’s adoption of Western culture – and even in our modern times, we continue to look down upon those of our own ‘race’ if they do not speak English ‘properly.’

But, aren’t Āryas fairer than Drāviḍas?

That statement is overly simplistic. The lighter complexion of people from the north-west of South Asia is largely a result of the cosmopolitan Indo-Greek civilisation that arose after Alexander rode through in 326BCE, and the subsequent arrival of the Central Asians, Chinese, Arabs, etc. Even before the end of the ancient period, Drāviḍas, Muṇḍas, and numerous other ethnicities and tribes were firmly established in their Ārya identities, enough to establish Mahājanapadas together. I am at a loss to explain why certain contemporary commentators continue to label ancient Indo-Āryas as anti-Black racists; the information does not seem to support this. Colourism does not play a part in pre-colonial Dharmic society as evinced in early Vedic, Saṅgam, Pālī and Prākṛit literature, and racism is the product of colonialism, so we should be careful of presuming to read our 21st century problems into ancient cultures; to do so would be to further colonial methodologies.

South Asian Divide and Rule: Spiritual society vs. Imperial society

As I have said, the imperial project – from whatever time period or geographic region – has ubiquitously deployed divisive tactics to pit indigenous cultures and traditions against one another in order for imperial dominance to be established whilst facing minimal resistance. Certain ancient Indian Kings in expansionist empires looked for the means to execute this. Cue the Mīmāṁsaka Brāhmaṇas, the most common type of court scholars, who began to compose the Dharmaśāstras – here, dharma means law, not spirituality – the most (in)famous of which is the Manusmṛti (the Law Codes of Manu, c. 2nd century BCE). For the first time on such a wide scale, and against the universalist ethical teachings of the Upaniṣads, Vedānta, Yoga, the Mahābhārata and Rāmāyaṇa, Indian societies were being manipulated by the expansionists through these legal codes with jāti (endogamous class) being its most insidious fabrication. Numerous people embraced it because it paid the worldly dividends that protecting one’s spiritual integrity could not. They were further led to believe that this is what the traditions they followed taught. Of note is the fact that even in the odious jāti system, skin-colour did not feature.

Yet, those who knew better, and were actually spiritual, resisted: Buddhists and Jains (and later, Sikhs) are well known for their abiding loathing of Indian jāti-based social structure as it developed. Much less known today (hint: who is educating us?) are the influential Azhwars (from ancient times to the 8th century) and Nayanmars (fl. 6th-8th centuries) who were Vaiṣhṇava and Śhaiva theologians from all types of jātis. Numerous episodes in the lives of the spiritual masters show resistance to jāti divisions as they contradict our spiritualities: the world-renowned Vedāntic Brāhmaṇa, Śaṅkarāchārya’s (c.8th century) famous episode with the chāṇḍāla in Vārāṇasi; Basavanna, who himself actively lifted the oppressed to the heights of their societies – declared that menstruating women could perform any ritual they pleased; Rāmānujāchārya (c. 11th century) fought with royal authorities to let all sections of society enter the regal temples and rejected the call for a brāhmaṇa guru, choosing instead to become a disciple of Kañchipūrṇa, who was of the lowest jātīs in their kingdom.

Even after the first religion-based foreign empires came to South Asia, Vaiṣhṇava and Śhaiva saints – like Kabīr Dās (Muslim-born Vaiṣhṇava) and Lāl Ded (Kāśhmīri Śhaiva Saint poetess) – embraced the humanity of the new arrivals even as those new kings (after 10th century) took thousands into the Arab slave trade after decimating the indigenous peoples of those regions. The newer legal codes composed in the conquered areas already possessed social divisions that enabled it to function to the benefit of the ruling classes in other areas in those empires. As these empires spread across South Asia, social stratification became increasingly commonplace, but even then, there were numerous kingdoms in South Asia that resisted.

How is any of this related to anti-blackness?

In ancient South Asia, therefore, it was not the case that everyone embraced social divisions, and those that existed in autochthonous imperialist projects did not rely on colour based divisions. However other global imperialist projects were about to arrive. In claiming that they needed to ‘civilize’ the world, the white world found its ‘uncivilized‘ fodder: the non-whites. Native Americans, Africans, Asians, and other indigenous peoples the world over: if we had anything of economic value, we were going to be on the receiving end of injustice, and then ‘educated‘ to believe that we indeed deserved the treatment unleashed upon us because of two things: the newly ascribed wickedness of our worldviews and our darkness which was touted to be a visible mark of our heathenness and lack of civilisation. Systemic colourism, racism, casteism, purity/impurity of whole groups of people, and homophobia were taught to the elites of our societies – the newly converted, the literate, the businessmen, the landowners. The British programme of aggressive deployment of educational and infrastructural projects was to benefit the colonials; but we were educated to believe that this is what a magnanimous, superior culture does. Why wouldn’t we want to think like them? It played on numerous whispers from the past but weaponised these sentiments so that the Empire could profit from subjugation, and we’d earn commission.

That is why anti-Blackness in the United States should be a major problem for Indo-Americans and other South Asian-Americans. We cannot let the colonial project with such rotten mindsets succeed. As we slowly work on cleaning our intellects and attitudes from this, we cannot ignore our sisters and brothers whose ancestors were also on the receiving end of the colonials through the transatlantic slave trade. The descendants of the enslaved are living in a land where the descendants of the slaveholders still hold on to the legacies of privileged power. There has not been any meaningful atonement for the atrocities of the slave-trade, and the systems established by slaveholders are still the most powerful in the country. Sure, the anti-racism movements of the 1960s were powerful and achieved some legislative parity; however, the real virus was not eradicated because cultural mindsets are harder to change.

Standing Now

It is high time that we stand with our Black non-binary siblings, sisters, and brothers, and work to root out all anti-black sentiments from our thoughts, words and deeds. As demonstrated, anti-Blackness is not part of our Dharma as established, so perpetuating it would be simply letting the colonial enterprise, and older dynamics of power and subjugation, be victorious.

When called upon, we should also be able to stand against any anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, homophobia, transphobia, nationalism, etc. not because the west taught us to do it, but because it is in our very ancestry to do so. We must act from an appreciation of the spectrum – the way of Dharma – and not the West’s binary boxing. There may be some of us worried about Hinduphobia, and it definitely exists. But, in the United States, Hinduphobia functions as an emerging part of the legacies of the colonial project. The population most brutally affected by the legacies of the colonial project today are, without a doubt, our Black siblings.

We need to heed our historic call at this moment: our precious Dharmic legacy from time immemorial – to query, to debate, to think critically and to evolve ever more deeply and capaciously. We need to do much-needed work in de-colonizing ourselves; and read more about Dharmic traditions, with their vast and multifarious discourses, and their long-standing tradition of query and reform, so that we may answer our call at this moment with knowledge, and not just rhetoric.

I would also ask that people think hard on their own journeys to the USA. What systems of privilege were at play? Have we actively tried to address them after arrival?

Yes, vasudhaiva kuṭumbakam. The world is indeed one family. We care for all members of our human family equally. But, that is not enough. Even in a struggling family, when one family member has been exploited in the way that they have for so long, it is up to the rest of the family to band together, share any resources, networks, talents and abilities that they have worked for, in order to lift up that long-suffering relative. Families that gloat are a distasteful product of imperialism. Families that enshrine and protect equity for all its members are the families that Dharma cherishes.

How We Can Help:

  • Vote after a thorough examination
      • It is all too easy in this time of misinformation to fall prey to the rhetoric and tabloid journalism masquerading as ‘factual.’ Please do some research for yourself – and be realistic. The majority of politicians are not ideal human beings at the best of times, and during electoral campaigns, the lies come thick and fast. Instead, compare past promises to actions taken. Do they tally? If the choices are harder, which one has better integrity and balance?
  • Spend Responsibly
      • Stop buying or funding those businesses and charities which have investments or directly participate in oppression – from the choices they make in suppliers, to labour conditions and products. If possible, support a smaller but ethical business even if a little more expensive.
  • Donate
      • Support charities and NGOs that are doing both advocacy work and the thankless task of healing. Numerous families have been the victims of police brutality and racism – look for foundations set up to support them, and, especially look for the charities that address the economic imbalance and the related social issues in a given community.
  • Inform Yourself
      • We might feel we are right in our viewpoint but do we have enough facts to have logical discussions without having to rely on emotional argumentation – which usually leads to broken connections? A few example readings are below as a rough guide.
  • Participate in tough discussions
      • When that well-meaning uncle says ‘they shouldn’t protest, they should work hard like us,’ or that aunty says ‘you are getting too tanned – you must be spending too much time in the sun,’ or, ‘don’t hang around with those low-class people,’ it might be worth checking your emotions, and then from a place of compassion, encourage them to think through and empathise with the situation. Maybe they could explain how their Dharma aligns with those statements?
  • Being Humble
      • As you go through this process, you might indeed have enough knowledge to have the ‘authoritative’ view in various arenas. But, humility would let people find out about your depth of knowledge when they engage you in conversation, not because you drop your presumed wokeness on the table. This doesn’t mean you are shying away from anything: far from it. It just means that you aren’t typecast into any box that would preclude you from future conversations on this topic. And, really, who could claim to know everything about this subject?

Further Reading:

The foregoing reflects my current understanding – I am willing to evolve and learn, so if any of the points are of interest, or contrarily, are opposing what you hold, I humbly invite you to engage me in discussions on this. For I firmly follow this polyvalent teaching of the Mahābhārata:

īdṛśān aśivān ghorān ācārān iha jājale |
kevalācaritatvāt tu nipuṇān nāvabudhyase ||
kāraṇād dharmam anvicchen na lokacaritaṁ caret ||

-Mahābhārata 12.254.49

There are, O Jājali, numerous acts of oppression are carried out masquerading as righteous; in fact, they are wicked. You practice them because they have been practiced by everyone from so-called ancient times, but you need to gain further awareness about this. One should practice spiritual ethics guided by logic and reasoning instead of blindly following the ways of others.

|| Hariḥ Auṃ ||

– Brahmachārījī.

Brahmachari V. Sharan, Ph.D., is the Director for Dharmic Life & Hindu Spiritual Advisor, and an Adjunct Professor in the Department of Theology and Religious Studies.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Our Response to Racism and Racial Injustice

Campus Ministry banner

Dear friends,

Current events serve as a powerful reminder of the persistence of racism and racial injustice in our communities. The tragic death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, MN, amid so many others, has evoked deep memory of our history of racial oppression. We are overcome with grief for the oppressed and for our own complicity in systems of oppression.

This moment gives fresh urgency to the call to be “people for others,” in the words of Pedro Arrupe, S.J. — people “completely convinced that the love of God which does not issue in justice for others is a farce.” (1) As a Catholic and Jesuit institution, we uphold the words of the 32nd General Congregation of the Society of Jesus, that “the promotion of justice is an absolute requirement” of the “service of faith.” (2) As people of diverse religious and non-religious backgrounds, we affirm that these words speak to a deeper, universal call — the call to care for the wounded among us, to seek understanding, and to dismantle the causes of all forms of violence. We commend all those who have responded to this call.

Georgetown University continues to atone for its participation in the sin of slavery. We lament that all of our traditions have at one time or another throughout history been complicit in raising up some at the expense of others. We who bear the privileges of these systems must reflect on our participation and root out the seeds of racism from our communities. Otherwise, these tragic patterns will persist. As religious leaders at Georgetown University, we commit to name, address, and dismantle the structures of racism and white privilege in our own midst. We will do this by:

  • Deepening our own formation around race and white privilege through honest, ongoing examination of the way they function in our personal and professional lives
  • Examining and addressing the ways in which race, power, privilege, and their intersections function in the operations of Campus Ministry, and in our religious communities
  • Working with our campus partners to include a racial justice lens in all our student programs, and creating programs that specifically address racism, and anti-racism awareness, competency, and action
  • Continuing this work well into the future, and not just in this moment in history.

In unity, we add our voices to those who are calling for racial justice, and vow to begin with ourselves. We seek to be who we all came to the Hilltop to become: people for others.


The Chaplains and Staff of Campus Ministry at Georgetown University



Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Being a senior in the time of COVID-19: A little less action, a little more contemplation.

Normally, at this time of the year, seniors are busy preparing for graduation, roaming campus with friends wearing commencement regalia taking photos on the steps of Healy Hall, and fielding questions such as where will you be working, or how are you preparing for the next chapter in your life? But this year is not a normal year. 

The Class of 2020 finds itself grappling with a whole new set of circumstances brought about by the fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic.  

While the transition to a virtual learning environment marked a dramatic shift in plans for their final semester of college, some seniors are reflecting on the many ways their lives have been enriched by their four years at Georgetown, and how this has prepared them for their current reality. 

Emily Jonsson (C’20) is one such senior. A Classics major, with minors in Anthropology and Government, Jonsson says the last thing she expected to be doing in March was moving back in with her parents. “But I also know that the moments that I will never forget, both at Georgetown and in general, are the ones I [did not anticipate].” 

She also says that being back home and living under stay-at-home orders has provided her with an abundance of time for contemplation and to take stock of the values she holds dear and the practices that help sustain her. 

“One thing in particular that I have been drawn to during this time, especially as I leave Georgetown on a very open-ended note, is the idea of forgiveness in the Catholic tradition,” says Jonsson. 

“What does it mean for me to leave Georgetown without that sense of closure? All of the should’ve, would’ve, could’ve…it’s all [I] have. And at the end of the day, I either carry that weight with me or I recognize that I am forgiven,” she says. “Grappling with this idea throughout this crisis has brought a greater sense of peace with how I am leaving college.”

Jonsson also finds herself journaling and meditating more now than she did on campus. She says Georgetown has always been full of so much “action” that there was little time for “contemplation” — except when the time was intentionally set aside for it. Perhaps, this is why I frequented the CCC —  Calcagnini Contemplative Center, the University’s retreat center — every semester, she wonders.  

Jonsson’s four years at Georgetown have largely been fueled by an innate curiosity that compelled her to explore opportunities — something she fully encourages all students to do — and following where they take her. For instance, an interest in meditation prompted Jonsson to attend Sunday night Āratī, one of the many different religious services offered by Campus Ministry. Āratī was a chance to spend time in conversation with Brahmachari Sharan, Director of Dharmic Life and Hindu Spiritual Advisor which, in turn, motivated Jonsson to sign up for two Magis India trips. Taken together, these moments not only add up to a better understanding of meditation, but they also helped deepen Jonsson’s understanding of her own faith. 

“Talking to Brahmachari helped me learn how I can take practices that are typically attributed to other religious traditions and develop my own religious and spiritual practices within the tradition I was raised [Roman Catholic],” says Jonsson.

This Saturday, May 16 Jonsson and the rest of the Class of 2020 will gather online for the 2020 Conferral of Degrees in Course and, although the moment will be colored by the pandemic and especially bittersweet, Jonsson is grateful for all that Georgetown has brought to her life. 

“Regardless of what the next step is in my life,” says Jonsson, “I refuse to lose that sense of wonder, that feeling of community, the things that allow me to come into wherever life brings me and make it home.”

by Paula Hong with files from Dustin Hartuv

Emily Jonsson (C’20), the self-described Campus Ministry gremlin, has been involved in Campus Ministry since her first semester at Georgetown.  Starting with Catholic Retreats, then in 2017 with Brahmachariji on the Magis: India trips and Ignatian Programs since Spring 2018.

Paula Hong is a senior in the College. She works at Campus Ministry as a member of the Ecumenical Team and attends Sunday Night Worship. 

Dustin Hartuv is a junior at Georgetown and a staff writer for Campus Ministry.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Finding Community With Song and Praise

Noah Williams (COL’21) says he first became involved with Campus Ministry through Protestant Ministry’s Sunday Night Worship services. “I really enjoyed the sense of community and the music so I decided to get involved,” he said. 

And so, during the spring semester of his freshman year, Williams was inspired to join Sunday Night Worship’s student gospel choir. 

“To me, it means much more than just performing. There is an elevated level of ministry to what we do that is unique to gospel music and the effect it can have on those listening and singing it,” says Williams. “Personally, it has allowed me to grow both musically and within my faith.”  

When asked how he was coping with social isolation and being away from a community that has been an essential part of his time at Georgetown, Williams says he’s doing well for the most part and turns to scripture for comfort. 

“One thing that I have constantly been reminding myself of is Psalm 46:10, which tells us to be still and know that God is still God,” he says.

Williams says he also stays in touch with other members of the choir through GroupMe and Zoom. “It is important to remain connected with those that help you stay grounded spiritually, he says. “Especially in times where it feels like there is no ground to stand on.” Adding that he is “eternally grateful” to the chaplains and staff of Protestant Ministry for their efforts to continue weekly services and programs, Rev IT Up and Bible Study online. 

For Williams and his peers, these are unprecedented times but Williams says his faith helps provide him with some certainty in all of the uncertainty, “… by knowing that God is still the same loving God in trials and tribulations that He is in times of peace and comfort.”

by Paula Hong

Paula Hong is a senior in the College. She works at Campus Ministry as a member of the Ecumenical Team and attends Sunday Night Worship. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Chaplains’ Tea, an NBA basketball star and Brahmachari Sharan: Ojus Jain’s first encounter with Campus Ministry

Ojus Jain with Dikembo Mutumbo

Ojus Jain (SFS’21) with Dikembo Mutumbo (C’91)

Although there is no guarantee that a former NBA basketball star will be at Campus Ministry’s Chaplain’s Tea, it certainly can happen. For Ojus Jain (SFS’21) it happened during his 2017 fall semester. 

“I first got involved with Campus Ministry at a Chaplain’s Tea early my freshman year,” he says. “I remember meeting Dikembe Mutombo (C’91) in the Healy foyer as I waited for [Chaplains’ Tea] to begin.”

While meeting Mutombo that day was, to say the least, unexpected it wasn’t the reason he decided to become more involved with Campus Ministry. Jain credits meeting Brahmachari Sharan, the director for Dharmic Life at Georgetown for influencing that decision. 

“That was also the first time I really had the opportunity to speak with Brahmachariji outside of the traditional ‘welcome to Georgetown’ context, and that interaction served as the foundation of our relationship,” says Jain.

Since then, he became more involved with Dharmic life and Campus Ministry which has also given him an appreciation of interreligious programming, something he looks forward to resuming in his senior year. 

“Personally, I have found interreligious understanding [one of the tenants of the Spirit of Georgetown] to be an important part of my Georgetown experience,” says Jain. 

“I think it is a cool and unique aspect of Georgetown student life. I have really learned that what brings people together is always much bigger (and better) than what may set them apart, and I think that is an important lesson for every person wishing to be a positive member in society,” he adds.

As Jain prepares to return to school in the fall, he says he also looks forward to strengthening his bonds with his peers and reclaiming the normalcy he once had as a Hoya. Until then, however, Jain is prepared to make the most of the uncertain times by reminding himself that change, along with uncertainty, is a fact of our existence and that aside from doing his part to flatten the curve and stay healthy the pandemic is out of his control. “That much is out of my control. What is in my control, however, is how I choose to orient myself during all of this,” Jain says. 

He also says there is a verse from the Bhagavad Gītā (Chapter 2 Verse 28) that he keeps in mind:

Avyaktādīni bhūtāni vyaktamadhyāni bhārata

Avyaktanidhanānyeva tatra kā paridevanā

“Everything comes from the unmanifest, in between it becomes manifest, and it returns also to the unmanifest…”

by Paula Hong

Paula Hong is a senior in the College. She works at Campus Ministry as a member of the Ecumenical Team and attends Sunday Night Worship. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment